PBIR Midnight Madness 3-11-2011

Elliot G

Elliot G

Spectator
These are all the good pics I got. I was testing out a new lens so dont be offended if you don't see any of you. Wish I would of realized that you could walk all the way to back to see the rest of the track sooner to catch some of the Bert and Fink action.







5533525892_aaf631aa64_b.jpg


5533544480_8ffb011f59_b.jpg


5532982031_281e26e9e3_b.jpg


5533585692_45faa21ff5_b.jpg


5533528634_8be1caa21a_b.jpg


5533547670_98531f3c57_b.jpg


5532985413_f75fd00c94_b.jpg


5533588618_6251983c20_b.jpg


5532949679_a8199b6921_b.jpg


5532988829_aaa97411ee_b.jpg


5533534478_c0a024e1f7_b.jpg


5533554034_6fb991b551_b.jpg


5533574446_505aa22855_b.jpg


5533537712_9a40f96992_b.jpg


5532975157_ea9158fae4_b.jpg


5533581866_5bfdf091e7_b.jpg
 
Good shots :bigthumbu, hoping to go to PBIR this summer, but for sure going to CFRC to get some stuff
 
FAL said:
What lens? why couldn't you autofocus?
Click to expand...

nikon 50mm f1.8 af-d on an af-s camera. lens was only 140 so id figure i try it out. i just gonna save now to finish my swap and then later possibly buy a 7d. I really want to try to get into some video production and i love the quality you can get from the 7d
 
Yea im working on getting a 70-300 or a 50-250, still not sure yet, for sure need to gt a bigger one then 18-55 for events to cover
 
Elliot G said:
nikon 50mm f1.8 af-d on an af-s camera. lens was only 140 so id figure i try it out. i just gonna save now to finish my swap and then later possibly buy a 7d. I really want to try to get into some video production and i love the quality you can get from the 7d
Click to expand...

$140? Damn prices must have gone up, I remember them being $120 on amazon.

Why 7D? D7000 is better in almost every way (AF video recording, higher ISO sensitivity, lighter/smaller, about $500 less) and you already have Nikon lenses. If you started with Canon, or dead set on getting one, I think the 60D is a better choice for the money.
 
FAL said:
$140? Damn prices must have gone up, I remember them being $120 on amazon.

Why 7D? D7000 is better in almost every way (AF video recording, higher ISO sensitivity, lighter/smaller, about $500 less) and you already have Nikon lenses. If you started with Canon, or dead set on getting one, I think the 60D is a better choice for the money.
Click to expand...

amount of continuous video time, it records 1080 at 30p and 24p where as they d7000 only does it at 24p, and the 7d shoots at 8fps where the d7000 only at 6fps
 
Elliot G said:
are you nikon or canon. if you nikon check this out, http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/dx-dream-team.htm, this is kenrockwell's dx dream team and pretty much covers everything you could possibly need
Click to expand...

Canon

---------- Post added at 05:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:40 PM ----------
Elliot G said:
are you nikon or canon. if you nikon check this out, http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/dx-dream-team.htm, this is kenrockwell's dx dream team and pretty much covers everything you could possibly need
Click to expand...

I'm probably gonna get the 55-200 Lens now, thanks :bigthumbu
 
Elliot G said:
amount of continuous video time, it records 1080 at 30p and 24p where as they d7000 only does it at 24p, and the 7d shoots at 8fps where the d7000 only at 6fps
Click to expand...

Tried to look up the continuous video time for each but couldn't find it, could you fill me in? Only thing I saw was max size per clip and it said 4GB for both.

I still don't think it's worth it for the money and for the headache of switching over to a complete new set up for 6fps more in video and 2fps more shooting photos. Like I said, if you had a Canon from the start it wouldn't even have crossed my mind to mention the D7000, but just thought I would throw it out there since you already have a Nikon set up.

Good luck with whatever you do.:bigthumbu
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom